INDIA’s Spice Route v/s CHINA’s Silk Road
In the middle
of European crisis, a silent re-alignment of two emerging Asian giants is
taking shape. This would force major changes in world politics and strategic
scenarios. Recent Pentagon report said China wants to expand its military
access to the Indian Ocean region and may set up access points or replenishment
bases in India’s vicinity within the next ten years. This will only intensify
Sino-Indian rivalry for domination of the Indo-Pacific Ocean.
China’s “one belt and one road” (OBOR) strategy has become major foreign
policy goal. Beijing will promote this initiative economically, politically,
militarily and culturally over the next eight to ten years. China
sees its “Silk Road Economic Belt” among its Central Asian neighbors as
indivisible from the “21st Century Maritime Silk Road (MSR)”. This indicates
that, like many Chinese foreign policy initiatives, MSR is multi-pronged and it
is intended to serve diplomatic, economic, and strategic purposes.
India’s ‘Mausam’
or Arabic ‘Mawsim’ refers to the season when ships could sail safely. The English
term ‘Monsoon’ came from Portuguese ‘Monção’, ostensibly from Arabic ‘Mawsim’.
The etymology of this word signifies the importance of this season to a variety
of seafarers. Kerala, a state in southern India, had two millennia-old ‘Spice
Route’. Its maritime trade relates to thirty-one countries associated with the
ancient Spice Route. Centuries of trade, migration, colonialism and modern
statecraft transformed these traditional interactions across the Indo-Pacific
Ocean, but present-day national identities and perceptions of the past are
deeply interwoven with age-old ties. The expansion of Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam
and Christianity helped define the boundaries of Indo-Pacific Ocean ‘world’,
creating networks of religious travel and pilgrimage.
This ‘Spice
project’ aims to explore the multi-faceted Indo-Pacific Ocean ‘world’ –
collating archaeological and historical research in order to document the
diversity of cultural, commercial and religious interactions in the Indian
Ocean – extending from East Africa, the Arabian Peninsula, the Indian
subcontinent and Sri Lanka to the Southeast Asian archipelago.
In nutshell,
the ‘Spice project’ has three-dimensional approach: first, to deepen cultural
bonding, second, to ensure maritime security and third, to broaden economic
connectivity with nations of the Indo-Pacific Region. As it has a strategic
ramification also, India is getting crucial help from the US in strengthening
its capabilities for a potential role and the Association of Southeast Asian
Nations. Though no details are made available to suggest India-US collaboration
in the region, the India-Japan-America (IN-JP-US) trilateral talks signifies
implicit with contours of strategic engagement among like-minded nations for
peace and security in the Indian Ocean highway – the Strait of Hormuz, the
Strait of Malacca and the South China Sea, around Southern Africa and the
Mozambique Channel. It is said that all these are cautiously worked out so that
strategic balance between India and China doesn’t get out of control.
But given the
unpredictable nature of China, India doesn’t want to lower its guard especially
when its maritime silk route plan is taking shape. China has been trying all
bids to regain a position of centrality in the Asia-Pacific region. It should
be noted that China’s ancient silk route that stretched up to the Mediterranean
Sea, covered India, Persia, Arabia and Rome. During 2nd century BC, China used
sea route to trade in silk to buy cotton and spices from India, precious stones
and other items from Persia, Arabia and Europe. China wants to revive that
ancient trade route through its new silk route plan mooted by Chinese President
Xi Jinping during his Kazakhastan visit in 2013. It envisions an economic
cooperation bloc from China to Southeast Asia, South Asia, Central Asia, the
Middle East and Europe.
According to
strategic experts, China’s planned silk route would effectively allow Beijing
to develop a parallel trading network – a huge maritime arc encircling the
whole of Asia and running into Europe. That means China will have a maritime
dominance in the Asia-Pacific region. Officials looking after the Spice project
in India maintain that it provides New Delhi an answer to counter balance
China’s silk route strategy as it allows the country to secure its interest in
the Indo-Pacific without engaging in militaristic adventurism. True, India’s
recent high-level diplomatic engagement with Southeast Asian nations, Fiji and
12 other countries of the Pacific region, Mauritius and other African countries
and South American nations like Surinam, Trinidad and Tobago—need to be seen in
the context of historical, religious and ethnic linkages India has with these
nations. Nonetheless, India seems to be on right track with regard to the project
“Mausam (Spice Route)” for which more than 50 countries have been identified.
Recently,
India has taken forward policy of maintaining its dominance in Indian ocean by
various naval co-operations, ties of building Deep Defense Assets in littoral countries,
however it depends on accurately playing its multi vectored diplomacy and
strengthening its defense infrastructure. India considers its sphere of
influence to extend from the Red Sea in the west to the Strait of Malacca in
the east which links the Indian Ocean with the Pacific Ocean. India has a defense
agreement with Oman which includes berthing right for its navy. In 2008 India
signed a defense agreement with Qatar which virtually makes India the security
guarantor of Qatar. India also has extensive defense ties with Singapore. India’s
Andaman and Nicobar Islands at the mouth of the Malacca strait hosts India’s
only tri-services command and India is looking to enlarge this by stationing a
division size force, more naval and air assets. India has a monitoring station
in Madagascar, complete with radars and surveillance gear to intercept maritime
communication and plans to have 32 radar stations installed in Seychelles, Mauritius,
Maldives and Sri Lanka. India secured the ‘development’ rights for two islands,
Agalega in Mauritius and Assomption in Seychelles.
While
countries littoral to the Malacca view the Indian Navy as a reliable and
non-controversial ally and are convinced of the Indian Navy’s ability to play a
non-threatening, security enhancing role and look towards India to be a
security provider in the face of increasing Chinese aggression, China will not
accept India as a guarantor of security in the region. India will have to make
sure it leaves no gaps in the security of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands which
in essence is a large unsinkable
aircraft carrier for India and a major worry for China as it gives India a
strategic advantage.
Finally, as not
mentioned explicitly in authoritative Chinese sources or media, the Maritime
Silk Road, and Chinese infrastructure investment, has implicitly intended to
facilitate more frequent People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) deployments in
the Indian Ocean and beyond. The PLAN needs reliable logistics chains across
Sea Lines of Communication (SLOCs) throughout Southeast and South Asia as ships
cannot go far without a reliable supply of fuel, food, and armaments. But for
the foreseeable future, China has a serious disadvantage in this regard - the
U.S. Navy and allied navies have such a preponderance of force and ability to
project power throughout the region, that the PLAN appears ill-equipped to
compete. Given the PLAN’s current capabilities, China’s logistics capacity
would only be dependable during peacetime - they would not survive in a conflicting
environment, particularly if the U.S. decids to close off key chokepoints like
the Malacca and Sunda Straits.
A combination
of diplomacy, strategic investments and increasing military strength in the
Indo-Pacific Ocean Region is the only way India can counter China. While India
develops its naval assets like aircraft carriers, submarines and other warships
to project power across the region, it will have to develop a strategic
doctrine for the Indo-Pacific Ocean Region all the way to East China Sea. A
strong navy is one of the means to achieve the strategic objectives.
No comments:
Post a Comment